Supreme Court reinstates life sentence in child defilement case
Supreme Court reinstates life sentence in child defilement case
The Supreme Court has reinstated a life sentence for defilement convict Evans Nyamari Ayako, overturning a Court of Appeal ruling that had reduced his sentence to 30 years.
The ruling, delivered on Friday, marks a significant legal victory for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), who successfully challenged the appellate court’s decision on constitutional and legal grounds.
Ayako was first convicted in 2011 by the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court in Ogembo, following a trial in which the prosecution presented six witnesses.
He was found guilty of defiling a child and sentenced to life imprisonment, the minimum punishment for the offence under Kenya’s Sexual Offences Act. The conviction and sentence were later upheld by the High Court.
However, in a surprising turn, the Court of Appeal reduced Ayako’s sentence to 30 years, citing global legal trends.
The judges argued that life imprisonment without the possibility of parole amounted to cruel and degrading punishment. They referenced jurisdictions such as Germany, Zimbabwe, and South Africa, where parole is permitted even in life sentence cases.
However, the DPP took issue with the decision and escalated the matter to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court dismisses murder convict Ruth Kamande’s appeal
MPs probe financial irregularities at University of Nairobi as VC fined over audit queries
Gachagua blames NIS boss Noordin Haji over Butere Girls incident
Government to spend 44.7 billion on construction of Talanta Sports Complex
MPs want teacher redeployment policy scrapped amid concerns of discrimination
Ministry of Education warns principals against hiring non teaching staff to coach students
In its submission, the prosecution accused the appellate court of going beyond its powers by modifying a sentence already clearly prescribed by Parliament.
“The prosecution argued that the Court of Appeal overstepped its mandate by reinterpreting a legislatively prescribed penalty, thereby breaching the doctrine of separation of powers,” the DPP said in a statement.
The DPP further argued that the ruling had ignored binding precedent, and called on the court to declare the decision per incuriam—a legal term for a judgment made in ignorance or disregard of the law.
The Supreme Court agreed, affirming that life imprisonment is constitutional and valid under Kenyan law. The court also stressed that any change to such sentencing guidelines must come from Parliament, not the judiciary.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the respondent shall serve life imprisonment as sentenced by the magistrate’s court,” read part of the judgment.
Ugandan opposition leader Kizza Besigye denied bail in treason case
Mercy Mwangangi appointed new SHA CEO
EACC summons former governor over multimillion road tender scandal
12 people killed in Limuru road accidents
EACC recovers Ksh6.5 million in cash inside minister’s car during raid
Why top police bosses should be elected by citizens – Wajackoyah
Follow us
