Supreme Court rules Finance Act 2023 is constitutional
The Supreme Court of Kenya on Tuesday overturned the Court of Appeal's judgment on the 2023 Finance Bill terming it constitutional
The Supreme Court of Kenya on Tuesday overturned the Court of Appeal’s judgment on the 2023 Finance Bill terming it constitutional.
The lower courts had ruled that the Finance Act 2023 was unconstitutional after the shelving of the 2024 version.
Petitioners argued that public participation was not lawfully conducted.
The Supreme Court, however, ruled that public participation in the Finance Act 2023 was lawfully conducted.
“The preliminary objection on this Court’s jurisdiction is overruled,” Ruled the Supreme Court adding, “We hereby set aside the Court of Appeal’s finding declaring the entire Finance Act, 2023 unconstitutional.”
This consolidated appeal concerned the legislative processes leading to the enactment of the Finance Bill upon receiving Presidential assent on June 26, 2023.
The Supreme Court in its verdict upheld the two findings of the issued by the Court of Appeal.
“We uphold the question relating to Section 84 (Affordable Housing Levy) introduced by the Finance Act, 2023 before the Court of Appeal was moot,” Supreme Court ruled.
Similarly, the apex court upheld the Court of Appeal’s rule that sections 76 and 78 of the Act amending Section 7 of the Kenya Roads Act and Section 87 of the Act amending Section 28 of the Unclaimed Financial Assets Act as unconstitutional as they were neither incidental nor directly connected to a money Bill.
A total of 11 petitions were lodged before the High Court by the 49 respondents, all of which challenged the constitutionality of the Act Finance 2023.
Kenya Power announces Ksh.30 billion net profit
School feeding programme to cover 10 million children by 2030 – Ruto
Peter Munya hits out at Raila over the Adani deal
Details of Ruto meeting with CIA Director William Burn at State House Nairobi
TSC announces recruitment of 20,000 teachers; How to apply
Government to recover salaries paid to 2,000 employees with fake certificates; EACC
The petitioners argued that parts of the Finance Act 2023 Act went beyond the scope of a Money Bill as defined in Article 114 of the Constitution.
They also pointed out that the legislative process of the constitution of the bill lacked concurrence from both the Speakers of the National Assembly and the Senate.
According to the petitioners, the Senate did not consider the Bill, despite it allegedly containing matters concerning County Governments and also lacked public participation all of which the Supreme Court ruled out.
The Court of Appeal had dismissed the contentions on the affordable housing levy and Statutory Instruments Act as being moot. Additionally, it dismissed the cross-appeals for being devoid of merit except to the extent that the High Court misconstrued its jurisdiction under Article 165 in holding that it had no jurisdiction to intervene in policy matters.
The cross-appeal has sought an order to have all taxes collected by the Kenya Revenue Authority from the date of enactment of the Act be refunded to the public.
Also read,
Senator Thang’wa reveals powerful forces behind 7-year term limit extension
Man gets life sentence for defiling his nine-year-old mentally challenged daughter
Senior Malawi politician accused of plotting to kill President Lazarus Chakwera
Government issues notice on collection of title deeds
Suspect in murder of Wells Fargo HR manager Willis Ayieko arrested
Senator to table evidence on corruption, political influence at Moi University
Follow us
