Another blow to Ruto as Court of Appeal declines to lift orders barring implementation of SHIF
3 min read
Court of Appeal declines to lift orders barring implementation of SHIF after High Court ruling
Court of Appeal declines to lift orders barring implementation of SHIF after High Court ruling.
The Court of Appeal has declined to lift orders of the High Court that pronounced three health laws unconstitutional that would have given effect to, among other policies, a new health insurance scheme.
The court has instead ruled that the matter will have to await a determination on the validity of the orders of the High Court, which had also stayed its orders for 45 days to give the government time to comply.
Attempts by the government to have High Court orders lifted have been delayed further as President William Ruto’s health plan remains on its sick bed.
Court of Appeal judges Francis Tuiyot, Lydia Achode, and Abida Ali noted that there is a risk that should the Court of Appeal agree with the High Court’s judgment in its entirety, the public harm would be greater and more costly.
They noted that there is no crisis as pointed out by petitioners since there is a transitional clause from the NHIF scheme, which is still operational.
The High Court last month, through a three-judge bench consisting of Justices Alfred Mabeya, Robert Limo, and Fridah Mugambi, ruled that there was no public participation in coming up with the new healthcare programme.
The court ruled that the Social Health Insurance Act 2023, the Digital Health Act 2023, and the Primary Healthcare Act 2023 stood unconstitutional, null, and void.
This prompted the government to quickly move to the Court of Appeal to have the finding set aside.
Police boss promotes Beatrice Chebet after winning 2 gold medals in Paris Olympics
Uhuru dismisses Raila claim that he asked him to reach out to Ruto
UK issues travel advisory against Kenya
Francis Atwoli warns CS Mbadi after meeting IMF representative
High Court bars plainclothes police from covering their faces
The judges at the High Court noted that there were disparities in the new Social Health Insurance Act since it would burden a few salaried individuals by creating a disparity in the contributions.
The three-judge bench directed that Parliament should undertake adequate public participation in accordance with the Constitution before enacting the three laws.
The court allowed Parliament 120 days to correct the anomaly beginning July 12th, even though the same court stayed the finding for a further 45 days.
The judges further noted that various clauses in the act offend Article 43 of the Constitution, which obligates every Kenyan to be uniquely identified for purposes of the provision of health services.
The Court of Appeal judges return to the bench on September 20, 2024, to give a verdict on whether it will stay the High Court orders or not.
Also read,
WHO declares Mpox a global public health emergency
EPRA announces fuel prices for next month
Senate rejects committee in Gov Mwangaza impeachment motion
Chaos as ODM youth groups clash over leadership positions
Ruto issues way forward after revoking university fee letters
Outrage as 68-year-old deaf woman is raped and killed in Homabay
Oscar Sudi renews attacks on DP Gachagua
Follow us
