Ichung’wah trashes High Court ruling stopping planned public participation on revised housing levy
Kimani Ichung’wah terms order by a Kisumu High Court unconstitutional saying Parliament will still proceed on public participation on housing levy
Kimani Ichung’wah terms order by a Kisumu High Court unconstitutional saying Parliament will still proceed on public participation on housing levy.
National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah has trashed a High Court order staying planned public participation on the revised housing levy law.
Ichung’wah termed the order by a Kisumu High Court unconstitutional.
“Article 118 of the Constitution obligates public participation in law-making,” he remarked after the court issued a stay order.
High Court Judge Lady Justice Saida Shariff Wednesday halted planned public participation advertised in local dailies pending the determination of the suit.
Grassroot Trust, a Kisumu-based lobby, argued National Assembly was out to undermine effective public participation.
Ichung’wah maintained Parliament would proceed regardless.
“Judicial and Executive AUTOCRACY has no space in the Parliament of Kenya and this order is UNCONSTITUTIONAL,” he quipped.
Ichung’wah termed the order as an infringement on the rights of Kenyans to give their views in lawmaking.
Responding to the tweet, Dr Paul Ogendi, the lawyer representing the petitioner, termed Ichung’wah’s outburst as a veiled attack aimed at the Judiciary.
“We will soldier on to protect the independence of the courts and the rule of law in the country,” he said.
He noted that what they are asking for is adequate and effective public participation.
TWO men commit suicide in Machakos
Tragedy as teacher butcher his two sons over domestic issues
Kenya improves on visa openness ranking; Report
Kenyan catholic bishops responds after Pope Francis approval of blessings for same-sex couples
The lobby had listed the Attorney General as the 1st respondent, the cabinet secretary for lands, public works, housing, and urban development as the 2nd respondent, and the national assembly as the 3rd respondent.
It argued that the said notice for public participation is too short and considering the nature of the Bill and its importance to the National Assembly should conduct adequate public participation especially targeting marginalized groups who may not know the contents of the proposed Bill.
The National Assembly had set December 28 as the deadline to receive memoranda on the Bill.
The petitioner argued failure to conduct adequate and effective public participation in relation to the Affordable Housing Bill, of 2023, disadvantaged the public.
Lady Justice Shariff directed parties to appear in court on December 27 for further directions.
Also read,
Government calls out BBC after publishing article criticizing Ruto
Dones of KEMSA-labeled drugs meant for Bomet County found in a private pharmacy
Waiguru defends TEN governors accused of not spending on development
Miguna Miguna hints at Ruto losing in 2027 presidential election
13 suspects escapes from a police while being taken to court
Follow us
